RETURN TO REVIEWS INDEX



Alwin Nikolais Celebration at the Joyce



Ririe-Woodbury Dance Company performs Gallery as part
of the Alwin Nikolais Celebration at the Joyce Theater.
Photo: Andrea Mohin/The New York Times

The Joyce Theatre
New York, NY
February 9–14, 2016

A Review

It is always with some trepidation that I attend a concert that presents the revived works of Niko­lais as I was privy to their creation and served as stage director for their many presentations. How­ever, I reveled in this production by the Ririe-Wood­bury Dance Company. Nik’s Dance Theater is alive and well.

The program opened with Crucible (1985), a work commissioned by the American Dance Festival in Durham, N.C., a good opener. It presents a dance of mirrored body parts and ends with a naked pa­rade. How better can one awaken the senses of an audience?

This was followed by the iconic Tensile Involve­ment (1955), which presents a three-dimentional moving design of elastic streamers with fast foot­work and solos that reflect the shimmer of the streamers. This work is perhaps the best known of Nikolais’s works as it was presented in Washing­ton, D.C. when Nikolais was a recipient of the 1987 Kennedy Center Honors.

Then came Mechanical Organ (1980), a tour de force of constant motion, presenting a series of corps dances, duets, and a solo. For most of his ballets Nikolais composed his own music, but for this dance he chose David Darling, a good choice, and I am sure Nik was pleased or he would have summarily replaced it. For the dancer Mechanical Or­gan is physically challenging, and this company stood up well under the constant pressure of the mechanical score and choreography.

After intermission came Gallery (1978), a full-length ballet based on the vision of a shooting gallery, consisting of group dances, interspersed with solos, duets and double duets. Over the years Nikolais composed several blacklight ballets. Perhaps this is his best, presenting, as it does, visions that would be impossible without it. How else could one present dislocated dancing sculls, and the piecemeal destruction of faces? Gallery has always presented some lighting difficulties, as did this production at the Joyce. This “destruction” of faces is the culminating statement of this ballet, and because of insufficient blacklight center stage, this culminating statement did not have the impact that Nikolais intended.

How minor this difficulty! This reproduction of some of Nikolais major works under the direction of Alberto del Saz deserves our accolades.

—Ruth Grauert. February 6, 2016     



RETURN TO REVIEWS INDEX